| | {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) |  |
|
+5{FOD}Fro$t Cyclone Cro$$fire Vengeance D-Ro$e 9 posters |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
D-Ro$e
Posts : 64
Join date : 2009-05-16
 |  Subject: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again)  Sun May 17, 2009 3:37 pm | |
| so after we beat them 3-0, they wanted another BATTLE the next night.
it was D-Ro$e, Khaos, Vengeance, Ace, Crossfire, and Cyclone.
and we won 3-0.
well kinda 4-0 cause we played polis massa twice cause KHAOS supposedly space walked!
hahah it was hilarious | |
|
 | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Sun May 17, 2009 6:30 pm | |
| it couldnt have been a battle since half of their players were LDS...
and didnt they win a map? | |
|
| | |
Cro$$fire
Posts : 69
Join date : 2009-05-11
Location : Lousiana
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Sun May 17, 2009 8:00 pm | |
| - Vengeance wrote:
- it couldnt have been a battle since half of their players were LDS...
and didnt they win a map? lol they did'nt win a map LOL? | |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Sun May 17, 2009 9:47 pm | |
| yeah they did but its just a scrim so its doesnt matter anyways
but it was 3-1 just to be correct | |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Tue May 26, 2009 4:55 pm | |
| note: this wasn't a battle just a scrim. (so it doesn't go on our record)  | |
|
| | |
Cyclone
Posts : 32
Join date : 2009-05-13
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Tue May 26, 2009 5:21 pm | |
| Dude, we should just have a record for whatever we do. not only battles, but scrims. | |
|
| | |
Cro$$fire
Posts : 69
Join date : 2009-05-11
Location : Lousiana
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Tue May 26, 2009 9:49 pm | |
| yA THEN WE WOULD look sexY  | |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Wed May 27, 2009 12:00 am | |
| Well what about a scrim record and battle record seperate? Because we lose some scrims due to trying to get more people involved. If we kept a record of the scrims there would be much more pressure, arguing, etc | |
|
| | |
D-Ro$e
Posts : 64
Join date : 2009-05-16
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Wed May 27, 2009 1:25 am | |
| dont keep scrim records cause sometimes i play engy which is the worst thing ever.
haha
so no scrim records cause sometimes we dont take them too seriously like when i kept dropping myself health while i was a rocket.
haha | |
|
| | |
{FOD}Fro$t
Posts : 13
Join date : 2009-05-22
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Wed May 27, 2009 2:23 am | |
| ill be in da battle wit scf if i can make it. | |
|
| | |
.:ATMOSPH3RE:.
Posts : 55
Join date : 2009-05-19
Location : wisconsin
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Wed May 27, 2009 4:39 pm | |
| dont keep scrim records..thats stupid | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Wed May 27, 2009 4:45 pm | |
| scrim records are justs practices so why keep count?  |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 7:53 pm | |
| ok no scrim records thenn. i agree with that too. | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:07 pm | |
| good. |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:08 pm | |
| haha linksys you really dont need to reply to every single post | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:10 pm | |
| on a good day i will.and i just started summer so its a pretty good day. |
|
| | |
IcemaN
Posts : 94
Join date : 2009-05-20
Location : NC
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:13 pm | |
| - Vengeance wrote:
- haha linksys you really dont need to reply to every single post
agreed hes a fucking posting spam whore | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:15 pm | |
| your mean.
go fuck your self |
|
| | |
IcemaN
Posts : 94
Join date : 2009-05-20
Location : NC
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:17 pm | |
| STFU U LITTLE ANNOYING NO GOOD INACVTIVE CRY BABY POST WHORING BITCH
Last edited by IcemaN on Thu May 28, 2009 8:17 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
Vengeance
Admin
Posts : 116
Join date : 2009-05-10
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:17 pm | |
| i mean that you spam post a lot and thats really not needed...
like just saying "good"...
posting is good. just make them more than a smiley face or something like that | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:19 pm | |
| alright.enough said then dident know it was such a big problem |
|
| | |
Acid
Posts : 35
Join date : 2009-05-26
Age : 32
Location : Middleport
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:23 pm | |
| Anger issuses? Nah. You just annoy him. Specific reasons? I will not tell you them. They are secret! | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Thu May 28, 2009 8:25 pm | |
| alright. i wont argue with him.. he gets very mean |
|
| | |
D-Ro$e
Posts : 64
Join date : 2009-05-16
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Fri May 29, 2009 12:03 am | |
| - {FOD}Linksys{U$A} wrote:
- your mean.
go fuck your self dont ever tell anyone to fuck themselves. especially someone who is extremely respected in the game. i can see people are getting tired of linksys and we might just have to do something about that because linksys attitude is ridiculous | |
|
| | |
Cyclone
Posts : 32
Join date : 2009-05-13
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 am | |
| FUCK U ICEMAN. JK bro, i luv you. no homo.  | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) | |
| |
|
| | |
| | {FOD}vs{SCF} (again) | |
|
